Questions about the Goal/No Goal market usually come after a result like this one. Twelve legs, one market, and a multiplier of 146,624.84. Here is the ticket, and the questions it raises, answered directly.
What exactly did this player bet on?
Twelve selections, all on the Goal/No Goal market, all predicting NG. An NG selection wins when one team finishes the match without scoring. Any clean sheet at either end settles the bet as a winner.
Stake: ₦205
Combined Odds: 146,624.84
Return: ₦42,081,329.53
Selections: 12
Market: Goal/No Goal, NG on every leg
Bet ID: B9VR7490459503Y-9938179
How does twelve legs reach 146,624?
Goal/No Goal prices reflect how often both sides find the net, and NG sits on the unpopular side of that. The odds on this coupon ranged from 2.16 to 3.35, which means the shortest leg on the ticket was still better than even money.
That changes the arithmetic completely. A dozen selections averaging close to 2.70 will outrun a much longer coupon built on short prices.
Was this skill or luck?
It deserves a straight answer rather than a sales pitch. Twelve consecutive NG results is an unlikely sequence, and the 146,624.84 price reflects exactly how unlikely the bookmaker considered it.
The idea worth borrowing is narrower than the result. Some leagues and some fixture types deliver clean sheets regularly, and prices do not always adjust. Look at the scorelines. Several were not close games at all.
The full coupon
| Selection | Odds | Result |
|---|---|---|
| NG | 2.47 | Stabaek IF 6-0 Hoedd IL |
| NG | 2.35 | Orebro 0-0 IK Oddevold |
| NG | 2.66 | Osters 3-0 Varbergs |
| NG | 2.16 | STK 1914 Samorin 2-0 OFK Dynamo Malzenice |
| NG | 3.05 | FC Nomme United 0-3 Viimsi |
| NG | 2.52 | Mohammedan 4-0 Baghpat FC |
| NG | 3.35 | PPJ/Ruoholahti 0-4 EIF Akademi |
| NG | 2.34 | Valmiera 3-0 Riga FC II |
| NG | 3.20 | Volda TI Football 7-0 Ranheim 2 |
| NG | 2.94 | Galatasaray 0-3 Venezia |
| NG | 2.78 | Lohjan Pallo 0-2 EsPa |
| NG | 2.79 | Independiente Petrolero 2-0 Guabira |
